Alan Dransfield's Blog

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=alan+dransfield+pilgrim+father+you+tube&view=detail&mid=50688970FCAB3602029350688970FCAB36020293&FORM=VIRE

Email sent – Mon 03/09/2018 10:54

Information Commissioners Office

Dear Madam

Under protection of the FOIA 2000 please provide me with
copies of the following

1. All correspondence between the ICO and David Lidington ref the recent changes to sect 45 of FOIA

2. Records of all phone calls, meetings etc
and personal notes from Ms Denham to the Queen on same subject.

3. Copies of all correspondence from your office pertaining
to sect 45 changes and responses from the Cabinet Office. This request is
neither vexatious, wide or unfocused.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – Thu 26/07/2018 20:17

Attn
Karla Bailey Lead Case Officer

Dear
Madam

I
now wish to elevate my complaint to the next level of the ICO complaints
procedure, as I fervently believe the ICO have breached my Information rights by
refusing my Subject Access Request ( SAR) on grounds my request is Manifestly
Unreasonable.

No
person applying a right and proper mind could refuse my SAR under such
exemptions.

As
you are aware, the ICO has consistently refused my FOI requests under section
14/1 vexatious exemption and now for the first time my SAR has been refused. It is consistently obvious to me that ICO senior managers including Elizabeth Denham
are acting in concert to harass me. At best, your refusal decision is a
Wednesbury Principled decision, and at worst, a decision to pervert the course
of justice. I suggest the latter.

In
the event I have not received a response to this letter within 14 days, I
intend to pursue a private prosecution commencing at Chester Magistrate
Court under protection of The Fraud Act 2006 and the Data Act 98

With
thanks

Alan
M Dransfield

Email sent – Sat 12/05/2018 20:39

Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham

Dear Madam

As you are aware, the ICO have instructed court bailiffs to
recover nearly £4000 legal costs in connection with The Court of Appeal Case
C3/1855/ 15th May, Dransfield v ICO.

Are you not aware that a public authority cannot use taxpayers money to seek legal redress?

Therefore, please advise your bailiffs to cease and
desist harassing me for such legal costs.

I will take this opportunity in submitting a FOIA request to
the ICO for all cases in which the ICO have pursued legal costs against any
FOIA complainant/requester since Jan 2013.

with thanks

Yours sincerelylan Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2017/2013857/fs50625810.pdf

Email sent – Sat 24/03/2018 22:58

Elizabeth Denham

FOIA REF CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA (CA)

Dear Madam

Under protection of the FOIA please provide me with the
following information ref the subject title.

1.A copy of the ICO application for the warrant.

2.A copy of the Warrant to search CA.

3.A copy of the Method Statement for the raid

4.A copy of the Risk Assessment for the raid.

5.A copy of the invoice for the combat ICO jackets.

6.A full list of all items confiscated.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – Fri 02/03/2018 08:52

Ms Elizabeth Denham

Information Commissioner

Dear Madam

Please see the following statement from the Anglian Water
Authority, who claims they have no liability for the FOIA 2000.

Such statements are, at best, misinformation and at worst published to circumvent the FOIA 2000. It beggars belief the Anglian Water
Authority would publish this statement on their website. To my
knowledge all the other water companies are in full compliance with the FOIA
2000. I expect the ICO to issue a heavy fine against the Anglian Water
Authority for their willful breach of Section 77 of the said act. Quite frankly,
I think the conduct of their CEO Peter Simpson is reprehensible.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

http://www.anglianwater.co.uk/about-us/information-requests.aspx