Alan Dransfield's Blog

Dear Mr Bailey

This is the latest Vexatious
Hogwash produced by ICO Mafia

Yours in disgust

Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1624250/fs_50588826.pdf

Email sent

Dear
Sirs

Please
review your decision because I do not accept your refusal is lawful.

With
thanks

Yours
sincerely

On 27 May 2016, at 16:18, FOI BOARD HQ <FOI.Dalian@ggc.scot.nhs.uk>
wrote:

Dear Mr Dransfield

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002

Further
to your request for information received on 30 April 2016, I am now able to
provide a response on behalf of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.

This
is attached together with information which describes your right to request a
review and subsequently to appeal to the Scottish Information Commissioner if
you are dissatisfied with our response or our handling of your request.

I
hope this is helpful but if you require additional information or if I can
provide further advice and assistance under the Act, please contact me at the
details below.

Yours
sincerely

Alison Flynn | Freedom of
Information Manager | NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde

Board HQ | J B Russell House |
Gartnavel Royal Hospital

1055 Great Western Road |
Glasgow | G12 0XH

e: foi@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
t:
0141 201 4461 w: www.nhsggc.org.uk

From: Alan Dransfield
Sent: 03 May 2016 20:34
To: FOI BOARD HQ
Subject: Re: Queen Elizabeth Children’s Hospital Glasgow – Our ref 11713

Thank you Alison and that is correct my request is For the
Royal Hospital for children

Thanks

Alan

Sent from my iPad

On 3 May 2016, at 17:41, FOI BOARD HQ <FOI.Dalian@ggc.scot.nhs.uk>
wrote:

Dear Mr Dransfield

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
(SCOTLAND) ACT 2002

Thank you for your enquiry received on 30 April 2016, for
information held by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde as described in your email
below.

You have indicated that the subject of your request is
the Queen Elizabeth Children’s Hospital Glasgow.

From this, I take it that your request is in relation to
the Royal Hospital for Children (rather than the Queen Elizabeth University
Hospital) and we will take your request forward on that basis.

It would however be helpful if you could confirm that
this assumption is correct.

We are dealing with this under our procedures for
requests made under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.
Our reference for your request is 11713.

A response will be issued as soon as possible or within
20 working days as set out in the Act.

If you have any queries about the progress of your
request, please contact me at the details below.

Yours sincerely

Alison Flynn | Freedom of Information Manager | NHS
Greater Glasgow & Clyde

—–Original Message—–
From: Alan M Dransfield
Sent: 30 April 2016 15:02
To: FOI BOARD HQ
Subject: Queen Elizabeth Children’s Hospital Glasgow

Dear Sirs

Under protection of the FOIA 2000 please provide me with
a PDF copy of the As Built Health and Safety File for the subject title,
sometimes known as the Operation Maintenance Manual.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

From: Alan M
Dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 May 2016 21:29
To: BRADSHAW Ben
Subject: Another Upper Tribunal Strike- out against Dransfield

Dear Mr Bradshaw

Please be informed the Upper Tribunal (UT) have delivered yet another strike out
against me in GIA/ 246/?2015 Dransfield v ICO ( again).

Unfortunately, I don’t have a PDF copy of this particular UT
decision from
Judge Mitchell but suffice to say the UT have a real grudge against
Dransfield and are blocking me at every turn.

My FOIA request was seeking Common Purpose connections/cosy relationship
with KBW law firm/ICO fraud complaint procedures and a number of other
benign and straightforward requests.

It will send you a PDF copy of the latest UT BS decision which is part of
wide conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, but what the hell do you
care about that.

For your information, action and files

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

From: alan dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]

Sent: 13 May 2016 06:54
To: giles@gileschichestermep.org.uk;
trevor.coleman@th-eu.nit.com;
info@grahamwatsonmep.org;
linda@juliegirling.com;
mep@williamdartmouth.com;
ashley@ashleymep.co.uk
Cc: BRADSHAW Ben
Subject: Complaint against EU Court of Human Rights

South
West MEPS

Dear
All

Please
see my letter to Ben Bradshaw below which is self explanatory. I am seeking
assistance from MEP SW ref EU Court of Human Rights Failures.

With
thanks

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield

—————————————————————————————

Dear Mr
Bradshaw

I
wish to make a formal complaint to my MP ref the conduct of the European Court
of Human Rights and in particular about their Registrar Miss Lafferty, who is a
UK Government gatekeeper.

Miss
Lafferty has destroyed my application bundle to the ECHR on a mere
technicality twice.

I am
attempting to appeal the Supreme Court on the Dransfield Vexatious infamous
Case and if you had once ounce of integrity you would be kicking doors down at
the EU Court on my behalf, because if I fail to overturn this Vexatious claptrap ref GIA/3037/2011,the FOIA -2000 and EIR -2004 will be become extinct.

In all
probability, that is why you are not prepared to help me because you are part of
the wider conspiracy to pervert the course of justice on this Vexatious BS.

Even
the electronic application Form at the EU Court of Human Rights is designed to
cheat the Aaplicants. You try to fill the form in on line and see what I mean.

At this
moment in time, the Vexatious Llgacy rests squarely on my shoulders because I
am the Leading Vexatious court authority in the UK as in GIA/3037/2011
Dransfield v ICO, and please rest assured Mr Bradshaw this decision leaves
a bad taste in my mouth.

In the
first instance, I would ask you to write to the MEP South West asking him to
assist my application. I would also ask you to alert the Lord Chancellor on this
matter but there again, he is fully aware of this because he is one of the
perpetrators along with the ICO and HM Judges.

In
a nutshell, the Dransfield Vexatious case is by far the most important
FOIA case to pass through the ICO and subsequent courts because my case is being
used unlawfully as a Court Authority to support get out of jail free cards by rogue judges and rogue ICO officials.

In
the event I do not get the Vexatious Decision overturned, Joe Public will be
gagged forever.

For
your information, action and files.

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield

PS

Polite
reminder for a copy of the Devon County Council reply to your letter ref Exeter
PFI schools.

Email sent – Sat 14/05/2016 06:40

Dear Mr Bradshaw

Under protection of the FOIA/EIR/DATA acts, I would like to
request an electronic copy of all data held which includes my name, ie Alan M Dransfield.
For clarity, I am requesting meta data held against my name.

I understand there is a £10
charge for such requests. I will send this fee when I receive contact from the
ICO.

The meta data shall include all
internal/external emails and personal notes held by ICO officials.

Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you need further clarification.

I wish to confirm this
request is made in the interest of justice, well-founded and in the public
interest and is NOT, repeat NOT vexatious.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Emai sent – Wed 11/05/2016 07:05

Dear Mr Bradshaw

Further to my earlier email, the following statement is from
the St Lukes As Built “Devon
County Council in compliance with their Statutory obligations under the

Construction (Design) and Management Regulations 1994 appointed Mowlem plc, to
act as Planning Supervisor for this project. Mowlem plc have compiled this Health
and Safety File in accordance with Regulations 14(d)-(f) and. the Approved Code
of
Practice, Appendix 4″

At best, this statement is BS and at
worst was designed to defraud the Ttxpayer; I suggest the latter.

The As Built HS File for the St Luke PFI school in Exeter is non
-compliant to CDM regulation and that’s the sole reason why the Devon County Council has refused my FOIA request under their Vexatious exemption.

I have every reason to believe the other 5 PFI schools are in a
similar sorry state to the 60-70 PFI schools in Scotland which have been closed
down. The difference being the oversight authorities in Scotland are taking the
issues seriously whilst the DCC top Bbass are complicit in a major fraud/scandal/cover-up.

Wakey Wakey Mr Bradshaw

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – Wed 11/05/2016 06:42

Dear Mr Bradshaw MP

As you are aware, you are still
waiting a reply to your safety letter from the Devon County Council ref the subject title. I
now have the As Built Health and Safety Files for the St Lukes PFI School and I
call upon my MP to meet me at your Friday night surgery to discuss this urgent
matter. As an alternative, I will provide you with a copy of the CD files which
confirms my allegations these Exeter PFI schools are unsafe and unfit for
purpose.

The root cause of the Scottish PFI Schools structural failures are the cavity wall ties and the structural steel ties to masonry works.

The ABHSF for St Luke’s School makes absolutely no reference to wall ties or anything similar.

The ABHSF is also devoid of any mechanical/electrical facets
to the school.

I suggest/recommend that you call for a full independent
Health & Safety and structural examination of the 6 PFI schools in Exeter.

You are also aware of the contaminated cement/concrete used
on all 6 PFI schools which holds life threatening ramifications for the
children and staff.

For your information, action and files.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – Thu 12/05/2016 05:54

Dear Mr Bradshaw

I have had more time to check the As Built Health and Safety
File (ABHSF) for the St Luke’s School and I can now say with confidence that
this document does not meet the Legal Requirement for Project/Contract
Documentation under Construction Design Management Regulations.

There is a legal requirement for the Principle Contractor
and Client to compile an As Built Health and Safety File a.k.a. Operation
Maintenance Manual. It is apparent the Devon County Council (Client) have failed their duty of
care ref PFI school Contract records

There are a large number of omissions from the St
Luke ABHSF, which hold life threatening ramifications for the end user.

They are:

1. Mechanical and Electrical facets have NOT been included.

2. There are no Specific Specifications for any facets of the
project.

3. There is no Completion Certificate.

4. There is no reference to any procedural testing ,i.e.
Electrical Testing, Building Air Test, Concrete Tests, Steel Mill Test, Lightning
Protection, Legionaire’s Testing etc .

It beggars belief the electrical and mechanical facets have
been ignored.

In other words the ABHSF is a bag of old rubbish, which as been cobbled together back in 2005/06 with the
sole intent to bluff the ABHSF mandate.

In light of the breaking news
from Scotland where 40-50 PFI schools have been closed down owing to structural
defects, it’s hardly surprising if the mandatory records have been abused to the
same degree as the Exeter PFI schools.

I suspect the other 5 Exeter PFI schools are in the same dangerous state.

I call upon my MP to seek a public inquiry into the 6 PFI schools in Exeter owing to the outrageous records
maintained by the Client,i e the Devon County Council.

It is therefore hardly surprising the DCC have spent
thousands of pounds fighting Dransfield Vexatious FOIA Cases when their own
records are so shameful.

For your information, action and files.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

PS

Are you sure you don’t want to discuss this matter at your
Friday night surgery?