Blog Image

Alan Dransfield's Blog

Freedom of Information and Health and Safety

This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.

Wind turbine collapse

Windfarms Posted on Sun, June 05, 2016 07:27:36

Email sent – Sat 04/06/2016 06:30

To – Liam.O’Neill@hseni.gov.uk

Dear Sir

Please provide me with

1. Copy of all photographs taken at the scene of the Wind Turbine collapse.

2. A copy of the HSENI map of the debris.

3. A Cost breakdown of the WT collapse,including site
visits, expenses, compiling report, overtime etc.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield



HSENI – Screggagh Wind Turbine report

Windfarms Posted on Sun, June 05, 2016 07:20:28

Email sent – Sat 04/06/2016 07:22
To – Liam.O’Neill@hseni.gov.uk, Darren.nash@hse.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Sirs

I would like to point out a
contradiction by the HSENI ref their Screggagh Wind TurbineReport.

BETWEEN

The last sentence in paragraph 1 “The member of
the public also alleged that there was debris from the stricken turbine strewn
across the public road”. i.e. at least 300 m to the east of the
failed turbine.

AND

page 8, paragraph 3 “There was a section of blade
approximately 267 metres form WTG3 that had blown up towards the top of the
mountainside (away form the Ecclesville Road) approximately 10 to 12 ft long
and weighing approximately 10 kg.” i.e nearly 600 m away from the
road and 267 m WEST of the failed turbine.

Question

1. Did the HSENI obtain evidence from witnesses
to confirm that the allegations of debris spread across the public
(Ecclesville) road was incorrect and should not be considered in detail by the
wind turbine failure investigation? i.e. That the allegations of
debris across the public road were false and malicious. Maybe the
allegations were just honest mistakes by confused witnesses?

2. Would the HSENI’s conclusion remain unchanged
” …. HSENI still considers the risk to the public to remain low….”,
if the allegations that debris was “strewn across the public road”
were actually true? i.e. Debris strewn 300 to the EAST of the
failed turbine, rather than 267 m to the WEST of the failed turbine as stated
in the HSENI report. It is noted that wind turbines WTG1 and WTG2
are a similar distance to the Ecclesville Road as the failed WTG3 turbine and
thus present similar risks to the public. Moreover and
more importantly there are WT Nationwide which have been installed a few
metes from Motorways,Railways,in Schools and Hospitals , and close be to
residential homes etc.

3. The report also suggest/claims that the
“possible collapse ” of a wind turbine because of rotor over-speed
was not known at this time. Such comments are codswallop.

As you are aware, I have elevated my complaint to the
ICO. This is not the first time a WT has collapsed from over speed, nor the
last.

I am also of the view that the HSENI are in consort with 3rd parties to
cover up serious crimes ref WT safety and the HSENI have misled the Irish
Government.

This case has now been elevated to the ICO but I would envisage they
will consider my complaint as vexatious under section 14-1 of the FOIA 2000.

It is only a matter of time before body bags are needed with a WT
incident and then you might take this subject seriously.

This Screggagha WT Incident is of huge importance for public safety and should require the HSENI and the English counterparts to
review the clearance distance regulations and if they do not, we will surely
have a major catastrophe sooner rather than later.

For your information, action and files.

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Devon FOIA Campaigner



McKenzie Friend system abused by Information Commissioner’s Office

Vexatious Posted on Sun, June 05, 2016 07:18:12

Email sent – Sun 05/06/2016 04:38 to mckenzie.friends@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Sirs

I would like to submit evidence
ref Mckenzie Friends Consultation.

My name is Alan M Dransfield and on the 24thMay 2016 I was
ejected from an Upper Tribunal Hearing (Information Rights) teleconference by a
First Tier Tribunal Judge Mr Callender -Smith whilst I was attempting to assist
Mr Norman Scarth as a Mackenzie Friend.

This can be verified by the FTT Appellant Mr Norman Scarth,
who I have cc this letter.

It is consistently obvious the FTT does not recognize the
Mckenzie Friend System

With thanks

Yours sincerely



Dransfield has more experience than anyone.

Vexatious Posted on Sun, June 05, 2016 07:13:14

Email sent Sun 05/06/2016 05:46 to GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk <grc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>; Civil Appeals – CMSC <civilappeals.cmsc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>

Application for Lay Person Appointment

Dear Sirs

Please send me an application
form for any future Lay Person appointments to either the First Tier Tribunal or the Upper Tier Panels.

As the UK’s leading Vexatious court authority, I feel I have
the required expertise to sit on the Lay Person’s Panel.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield.



A Travesty of Justice?

Vexatious Posted on Sat, May 28, 2016 06:44:48

From: alan dransfield

Sent: 27 May 2016 06:46
To: Richard Bailey
Subject: GIA/2615/2014 Scarth v ICO -FOIA REQUEST

Attn
Richard Bailey ICO Solicitor

Dear
Sir

Under
protection of the FOIA 2000,please provide me with the following information

1.
Total Cost of this case to date.

2. A
copy of the ICO apology to Mr Scarth ref the ICO mistake, e treating his
request as personal data not an FOIA request.

3. An
electronic copy of all ICO case files on this specific case.

4.
Copies of KBW invoices from on this case plus all KBW letters and emails.

5.
Copies of all ICO internal email from ICO.

6. Who
directed the ICO not to attend the teleconference for last Tues 24th May 2016?

For
clarity, this is my First FOIA request regarding Mr Norman Scarth or this
specific case GIA/2615/2014, therefore, it should not be considered as
vexatious and it is not an environmental issue, therefore should not be
considered under section 12(4)(b) “Manifestly Unreasonable”.

For the
record, I am Mr Norman Scarth’s McKenzie Friend. On Tues 24th May 16, Mr Scarth
and myself were unlawfully ejected from the teleconference of the FTT in London
after only 7 mins into the hearing.

With
thanks

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield



Judge Callender-Smith

Vexatious Posted on Sat, May 28, 2016 06:41:47

From: alan dransfield

Sent: 26 May 2016 06:57
To: BRADSHAW Ben
Cc: aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Richard Bailey; govem@parliament.uk;
John BERCOW; Norman Lamb
Subject: Fraud by First Tier Tribunal Judge

Dear Mr
Bradshaw

I
can now identify the First Tier Tribunal Judge who appeared to pervert the
Ccurse of justice on Mon 23rd May 2016 during a NEW FTT hearing involving
Mr Norman Scarth and myself acting as Mr Scarth’s Mackenzie Friend.

It was
Judge Calender-Smith from the FTT.

From
start to finish of this FTT hearing lasted no more than 10 mins and then
Judge Smith aborted the hearing because he said I had not identified myself,which is factually incorrect as the FTT Tape Recording will show.

Mackenzie
Friends are allowed in the British legal system and there is a myriad of
examples from court authorities which support this statement.

Judge
Callender-Smith aborted this hearing solely because Alan M Dransfield was a
Mackenzie Friend in one of his cases.

Judge
Callendar Smith …….has unlawfully used the Vexatious Exemption against me
several times to date.

He has
now stooped to the lowest standard possible be debarring my access to HM
Courts.

I
call upon my MP to write to the Lord Chancellor and demand a public inquiry
into the conduct of this FTT Judge.

For
your attention, action and files

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield



This can’t be right.

Ben Bradshaw MP Posted on Sat, May 28, 2016 06:35:55

Email sent – Tue 24/05/2016 19:33

Dear Mr Bradshaw

I write to my MP seeking assistance ref the subject title.

I was expelled from an Upper
Tribunal video link hearing earlier today and debarred from acting as a
Mackenzie Friend to Mr Norman Scarth. Unfortunately, I cannot provide the Upper Tribunal Judge;s name as I wasn’t on the link long enough to ask his name. I was expelled
from the video link after only 5 mins.

This UT Judge’s conduct is not
conducive to HM Judges expectations.

I look forward to your response

with thanks

Alan M Dransfield



Maybe he is busy with media appearances

Ben Bradshaw MP Posted on Sat, May 28, 2016 06:25:53

Email sent – Wed 25/05/2016 07:26

Dear Mr Bradshaw

Polite follow up please. I appreciate you are a very busy MP
but several of the issues below are life threatening and number 7 is a direct
threat to HM The Queen and other Royals. Please also note that since I last
wrote to you on such matters, I wish to add the Supreme Court to my item #8.

I would hope you might reconsider your lifetime ban imposed
against me from attending your Friday night surgery.

With thanks

Alan M Dransfield.

—————————————————————————-

Dear Mr Bradshaw

The following is a list
of outstanding issues which you have failed to address and I wonder
if you would consider meeting with me at your Friday Night Surgery to discuss
these issues in specific details please.

1.Your lifetime ban against
me attending your Friday Night Surgery.

2. Lifetime email ban against
me by the HSE/Devon Police/Police Commissioner and the Devon County Council.

3. Life threatening Issues at
the Exeter Chief’s Rugby Stadium and Bridge.

4. Life threatening issues at
the new climbing tower on the Exeter Quay, including gas shutdown valves failures, tower handrail safety and lightning protection irregularities, plus
Legionaries, Weils disease,etc.

5. Dartington Primary Schools
Health and Safety issues and fiscal irregularities.

6. Health and Safety issues
at the Six PFI schools in Exeter and fiscal irregularities.

7. Mortal danger to the realm
at the Olympic Stadium.

8. Wider conspiracy by the
Court of Appeal,Upper Tribunal, ICO to pervert the Course of Justice and to gag Joe Public.

9. Life threatening
dangers at the Olympic Stadium.

10. Lighting Protection
Irregularities at the RDE Hospital, Exeter.

11. Lightning Protection irregularities at the Met Office.

12. Lightning Protection
irregularities at the County Hall.

13. Lightning Protection irregularities at Princesshay Shopping Centre.

14. Public and Rail safety of
the Dawlish Rail Section.

15. FOIA irregularities at
the Devon County Council

16. Planning approval and
Fraud at the Exeter City Council.

17. Fiscal irregularities and
value for money failures at the DCC.

18 Lightning Protection irregularities at the new John Lewis Store in Exeter.

19. Lightning Protection irregularities at the Exeter University and College Premises.

20. Wind Turbine
irregularities and public safety in Devon.

21. Labour Party failures to
ensure Government compliance and value for money. There is no dispute
over this failure because that’s the main reason why the Labour Party got
trashed at the last general election.

22. Failure by the Devon
County Council to ensure ALL schools and public buildings are provisioned with
Lightning Risk Assessment.

23. Multi Million Pound
spending by the DCC on FOIA court cases, schools window designs, Dartington
School High court case, Employment Agreements.

24. Your Anti Wrinkle Cream
Activities.

25. Life threatening dangers
at the Houses of Parliament.

26. The DCC £1/2 billion portfolio

27. Tory conspiracy to gag Joe
Public and demolition of the FOIA 2000.

28. Cycle path safety
in and around Exeter.

29. Fraud on the multimillion
pound Flood Relief Programme in Exeter.

30. Malfeasance and deception
by the EUCoHR Registrar Michele Lafferty who is debarring UK citizens right of
access to EU laws.

31. Multi Million pound compromise agreements by the Devon County County Council with former
employees.

32. Lafarge contaminated
cement on public works contracts in Devon from 2000 to 2006 and what measures if
any were put in place to safeguard against any repetitions.

33. Fraud and fiscal
irregularities at the Exeter Museum.

34. Fiscal irregularities and
H&S issues at numerous housing association premises in Exeter.

I am sure I have forgotten a
few other topics but the above list will suffice for now.

What are you going to do
about these matters, continue to ignore me and hope I will go away or shall we
wait until we need body bags before you take me seriously?

The main reason why the Labour party got a good trouncing at the last general election is because
Labour MP’s such as you have lost their moral compass and they ignore
their constituents and they have turned a willful blind eye to the art of shadow government.

I fully understand that my
main recourse will be via the ballot box but I intend to hold you responsible
for a myriad of health and safety issues, fiscal irregularities and fraud and
theft of public funds by local authorities in Exeter.

Ignore me at your peril.

Please rest assured not one single item above is vexatious.

For your information, action
and files.

With thanks

Alan M Dransfield



« PreviousNext »