This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.
Email sent – 30/07/2016 07:11
Information Commissioner
Elizabeth Denham
Dear Madam
Please see the KBW Law firm
report on the Dransfield Vexatious claptrap. Any fair minded person would
agree that KBW appear to get most if not all of the ICO legal works which is a
breach of EU Trade Law.
This KBW report confirms my allegation that the ICO are in
meltdown.
For your information, action and
files
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent – 30/07/2016 08:02
Solicitor Regulators Authority
Dear Sirs
I wish to lodge a formal
complaint against a public authority solicitor who, I claim has acted in bad
faith to pervert the course of justice.
In particular, I refer to Mr
Richard Bailey who is the Solicitor for the Information Commissioner’s Office
(ICO).
ICO records will show that Mr
Bailey has knowing and willfully circumvented sect 77 of the FOIA …….An ocular inspection of ICO decision
notice records will show bad faith and willful blindness by Mr Bailey. I
refer to GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO.
ICO records will also show that section 14/1 of the FOIA is
being abused to hand down vexatious exemptions on a whim by Mr Bailey.
This ICO notice will show Mr Bailey acted in concert with
the Ministry of Justice, Devon County Council and other 3rd parties to defraud
me and other UK Citizens.
For you information, action and files
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent – 10/07/2016 08:21
Att the Information
Commissioner’s Personal Assistant, Miss Louise Mottershead.
Dear Madam
I wish to offer irrefutable, tangible evidence that my
original FOIA request to the Devon County Council copy of the sought after data subject to
my original FOIA request. In particular, I refer to the As Built Health and
Safety File which is attached and some 300 plus pages.
May I suggest you run a search engine of this PDF file under
Lightning and you will not find one single entry? I suggest you even try the
incorrect spelling of lightening and still you will find not one single
entry either.
In a nutshell, this As
Built Health and Safety File (ABHSF) shows my request was in the public
interest and my allegations of wrong doing by the Devon County Council were factual and
well founded. The attached document was published under a FOIA request to a
3rd party via the What Do They Know website in 2014.
This attached file also proves
without a shadow of doubt the DCC committed perjury and the ICO have knowingly
and willfuly submitted false and misleading information to the FTT/UT/Court of
Appeal and Supreme Court.
I wish this attached document and this letter to be placed
in the in-tray of the new Information Commissioner because when she reads this
attached document she will surely instigate an internal inquiry in the
Dransfield Vexatious decision. The existence of this ABHSF has been known by
all parties since my original FOIA request in April 2009.
The attached ABHSF is
irrefutable,concrete evidence that the ICO has been part of a wider
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and in particular the willful breach
of section 77 of the said act.
Suggestions and
recommendations
Arrange an urgent meeting with the New Information
Commissioner, Miss Denham with the full board of ICO directors to discuss
this Dransfield Vexatious case. ………
The ramifications of this are very serious because the Dransfield Vexatious request must be revoked as a
matter of urgency, which means approx 1800 Vexatious decisions handed down by
the ICO as a Dransfield Court Authority shall also be revoked. Ditto for the
1000 ICO decisions under the EIR-2004
Any such meeting at the ICO will be pointless unless I
attend personally, with my Legal adviser.
Owing to the gravity of my allegations, please acknowledge
receipt of this letter.
Quite frankly, given my allegations of wrongdoing by Senior ICO officials
behooves the ICO to call for a criminal investigation by Cheshire Police
Authorities.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
(attachment is too large to upload to this blog)
Email sent –
Leicester City Council
FOIA Department
Dear Tracey
I acknowledge and thank your for the FOIA Package for 4 PFI
schools in your district, which I received yesterday via Royal Mail. I now
request a review because I claim the information you sent me was not as per my
FOIA request.
My request was was for a copy of the AS BUILT HEALTH AND SAFETY
FILES. The information which you sent by post was for four (4) PFI
schools.
1. Judgemeadow Community College
2. Crown Hiils College
3. City of Leicester
4. Soar Valley
The information you sent me was not the As Built HSF; it was
the pre-construction HSE files which are a completely different animal altogether.
It is clear from the data which
you sent is written in the future tense ,i.e pre-,construction the documents refer to
the design shall be, the new school shall be, the classrooms shall be, the road
shall be, the roof shall be, the fire hazard plans shall be, the safety system
shall be etc. The consistent use of shall be is a clear indication the data you
sent was not the ABHSF. The dates on this data also support my claims., ie
2005/06/07.
The data on the ABHSF would be post completion
certificate.
However, I do commend the
Leicester City Council for releasing this information which they considered to
be the As Built HSE files because my own public authority have refused a
similar request under section 14/1 of the FOIA -2000 vexatious exemption.
It is consistently obvious to
me the Leicester City Council are not aware of the difference between Pre
-Construction Files and As Built HSF.
The total number of pages received in the package is approx
200 pages and the package weighed about 3/4 kilos which also which is yet
another indicator that the data you sent was not the sought after data.
As Built Health and Safety Files for 4 PFI schools would
weigh in the region of 4-500 KG; hence, that is why I asked for PDF files
which are available according to the information you sent yesterday because it
refers to the BUZZASAW System.
I would also point out that the four files you sent yesterday breach the DATA 1998 because there is not
one single redaction.
The files includes personal details of personnel.
I also note that one of the
schools appears to have been built on a Landfill Sitewhich is still gassing.
Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you need further clarification between Pre-Construction data
and As Built Data.
The information you sent me confirms that Miller
Construction was the Principle Contractor for these schools. They were the same
Contractor whose PFI schools in Scotland were subject to serious H&S defect
a few weeks ago.
With thanks
Yours Sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent – Fri 08/07/2016 06:45
Louise Mottershead
PA to the Information
Commissioner Miss Newham
Dear Madam
Please see the following link which confirms the
GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO has been used to protect the David Kelly
secrets.
It would appear …. Christopher Graham at the Information Commissioner’s Office has
acted in concert with the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court to pervert the
course of justice……..
This latest revelation about the ICO being complicit with Blair and current Government Officials and in particular to use the GIA/3037/2011
Dransfield v ICO is of the gravest allegation, it behooves your office to alert
Miss Newham.
Please add this to my list of misconduct by ICO officials, as it is
imperative Miss Newham is informed about this matter asap.
As you are aware, I am on record that the ICO are in meltdown and these
David Kelly allegations compound the matter.
I do state that the Dransfield Vexatious Case and the conduct of the ICO are
a top priority for the New Information Commissioner Miss Newham, who takes
control on the 18th July 2016……..
Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.
For your information, action and files.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/vexatious_foi_requests
PS
May I take this opportunity in submitting a brand New FOIA request to the
ICO.
1. Please advise me of Christopher Graham’s pension plan details.
2. Please advise me if Christopher Graham has signed a Comprise Agreement.
From: alan dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 July 2016 08:52
To: Louise Mottershead
Cc: BRADSHAW Ben; GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Fiona Miller miller; John BERCOW; aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Richard Bailey; Maurice Frankel
Subject: HALLELUJAH,HALLELUJAH DRANSFIELD IS NOT VEXATIOUS
Miss Louise Mottershead
PA to Elizabeth Denham
Dear Madam
Please see the attached
First Tier Tier Tribunal decision which now requires the ICO/UT/Court of Appeal and
Supreme Court to revisit the GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO case.
The FTT Judge Callender Smith has made a very courageous decision or he has now seen the error of his ways and has ignored the Supreme
Court Vexatious authority.
Judge Callender Smith claims that public authorities are
abusing the Dransfield Vexatious case.
Please ensure this letter is brought to the attention of
Miss Denham, the incoming Information Commissioner.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent – 03/07/2016 12:10
Dear Mr Bailey
I consider the enclosed ICO decision is unlawful because
you have failed to include the Court Authority on which the ICO rely upon, i.e
the GIA/373/2011\Dransfield v ICO
Please bring this matter to the attention of your legal
team to avoid any repetitions, and please amend this particular decision.
With thanks
Alan M Dransfield
https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1624536/fs_50618433.pdf
