Blog Image

Alan Dransfield's Blog

Freedom of Information and Health and Safety

This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.

Asking about the deaths of mothers and babies is “vexatious”

Vexatious Posted on Thu, January 19, 2017 19:35:10

Email sent –

Dear Miss Denham

The latest vexatious decsion upheld by the ICO is related to
numerous avoidable deaths of Mother and Babies at Morcombe Bay Hospital. Please
see the report into the incident(s).

It beggars belief the ICO
upheld the Public Authority Vexatious decision. In essence the ICO are covering
up serious crimes at the Morcombe Bay Hospital by upholding this vexatious
claptrap. In essence you are preventing the flow of information to the families
and relatives who lost loved-ones at Morcombe Bay,which denies final
closure.

Moreover and more importantly
you have now released a vexatious decision into the public domain which is
unlawful by virtue it does not carry the Dransfield Vexatious GIA/3037/2011
Precedence. The author of the ICO decision Mrs Pamela Clement is an
experienced ICO Officer, please note , I say experience, please do not
take that as I refer to her as Honest and with Integrity because I certainly do
not.

This is just another clear
example of BAD LAW being used by the ICO.

For your information action and files

Alan M Dransfield

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408480/47487_MBI_Accessible_v0.1.pdf



Eh up! What’s going on ‘ere, then?

Vexatious Posted on Thu, January 19, 2017 19:09:02

Email sent – Thu 19/01/2017 18:26

Information Commissioner Ms
Elizabeth Denham

Dear Madam

Please see you very latest
vexatious decsion from your website. This particular decision notice is
unlawful because you have not relied upon the Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedence
as per GIA/3037/2011. Does this mean you have now realised the Dranfield
Vexatious Decision is also unlawful and thus, you cannot use it as a
Court Precedence? There must be a reason for not relying upon the Dransfield
Case Authority after three years continuous use and over 6000 vexatious
cases. Please provide me with a full explanation why you have not relied upon
it.

I also consider this
decision is yet further evidence the ICO is in Contempt of the ECoHR via the
Magyar Helsinki Bizottsag Case.

For your information action and
files

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2017/1625700/fs_50640819.pdf