Alan Dransfield's Blog

Email sent – Thu 12/01/2017 08:19

Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss.
Lord Chief Chancellor

Please see the two URL links
below. The first letter is from Surrey Police to an unknown 3rd Party whom the
Surrey Police refused the Jimmy Saville tapes based on the
Dransfield Vexatious Decision GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v IC.

The second URL is the ICO
Decision which upholds the Surrey Police Vexatious Decision and, in particular, I draw your attention to para 12/13 in which the ICO has relied upon the
Dransfield Vexatious Case.

In essence, both the Surrey
Police and the ICO claim that child sex abuse is not (repeat not) in the public interest and not (repeat not) a serious purpose subject.

No person applying a right and
proper mind could make such a statement because it is a well documented fact that Jimmy Savile committed heinous crimes on countless children and
young people over three decades.

Therefore, it must be assumed
that both the ICO and Surrey Police are part of a wider conspiracy to pervert
the course of Justice by consistently circumventing the FOIA -2000 and in
particular the wilful breach of section 77 of the said act, which, as I am
sure you are aware, is a prisonable offence.

It beggars belief that the UK
Information Commissioner can uphold a Vexatious Exemption from one of HM Police
Authorities (Surrey Police) regarding the evil Jimmy Savile and quite frankly I
am disgusted to find my name in the same paragraph as this monster.f Human Rights via Magyar Helsinki Bizottsag case ref 18003/11 dated 6th Nov
2016…..

….It is very disconcerting that we have a Lord Chief
Chancellor, whois devoid of any legal experience or qualifications
whatsoever, who also appears to be devoid of any moral compass. Madam Lord
Chancellor, you are well overdue for a wake up call because these serious crimes
are happening under your watch and the buck stops at your desk.

It is my duty of a law abiding citizen, FOIA Campaigner and Social Watchdog to alert you about such matters.

This letter is not intended to be either vexatious or scurrilous, it is
written in the interest of Common Law and EU Law.

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

FOIA Campaigner & Social Watchdog

https://www.surrey.police.uk/media/3375/about_us_jimmy_savile_review_response_letter_foi_165_13_762.pdf

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2014/1020038/fs_50526275.pdf

Email sent – Tue 10/01/2017 23:09

Dear Mr Bradshaw

Please see the following regulations from the
International Maritime Organization and it is clear that the Chad/Cameroon
Pipeline Offshore floating storage tanker is obsolete but still in service.

The offshore floating storage tanker, the Komi Kribi 1, is a Category One(1) Single – hull tanker,
therefore became obsolete on its 30th birthday. This tanker was built in
1977; hence past its sell by date.

This is a serious breach of International Maritime
Organization regulations (see attached). Hence, I call upon my MP to write to
the DFID and World Bank calling for this tanker to be replaced with a double hull tanker in line with IMO regulations.

Maybe Boris Johnston could have a word with Rex
Tillerson about this serious safety and environmental
matter!

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://www.intertanko.com/upload/ChangjiangBill.pdf

http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/disciplinary-statements/2012/

https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/regulatory-requirements/the-barristers’-register/?ProfileID=1679ac8271bc65659e95a2e13c0b73ef

Email sent – Tue 13/09/2016 06:51

Information Commissioners Office

Attn Ms Elizabeth Denham IC

Dear Madam

I would like to offer further
tangible evidence why the Dransfield Vexatious decision is unlawful.

Please see the
Whatdotheyknow FOIA History, where another member of the public has made
a very similarly worded FOIA request for exactly the same sought after data
as my FOIA request, i.e the As Built Health and Safety Files for the Sandy Park
Rugby Bridge.

Initially, this requester was accused of acting in concert
with me but then his request was fulfilled.

This request was only a few weeks after Judge Wikeley
Vexatious decision.

Therefore, the Devon County Council were indeed very wrong
to rely upon section 14/1 vexatious exemption then release it in full a couple
of weeks later.

You must also be mindful that it was the ICO not the Devon
CC who appealed the FTT non-vexatious decision.

Oh what a web we weave when we
set out to deceive Miss Denham.

I wish to go on record
that your consistent failures to either respond or acknowledge my
correspondence on this issue must be classed as dumb insolence.

For your information, action and
files

With thank

Yours sincerely

Alan Dransfield

Email sent – 03/09/2016 06:11

Richard Bailey

Information Commissioner Solicitor

Dear Mr Bailey

Three days ago, I asked you a specific question, how long has
Alex Ganotis worked for the ICO and when did he complete his Register of
Interest.

You are normally very prompt with your responses, but
this time you have not replied to my direct questions. I understand Mr
Ganotis has worked for both the ICO and Stockport Borough Council since 2008.

I also asked you how long you have known about this.

I also asked you a question about the ICO Register of
Interest for ICO officials.

May I take this opportunity is submitting another FOIA
request to the ICO. i.e How many Compromise Agreements have the ICO
entered into with Ex ICO Officials please?

For your information, action and files

Yours sincerely

ALan M Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1624897/fs50625545.pdf