Alan Dransfield's Blog

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/130612w0001.htm

(Scroll down to Lord Willis/FOIA)

Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 2:02 PM

Subject: ICO New Vexatious Guidelines Version 1 (201305

To Richard Bailey, ICO Solicitor

Dear Mr Bailey

I note the New ICO Guidelines version 1- 20130514 (37 page document) is not dated.

Can you please advise me why that document was NOT signed and NOT dated.

If such matters don’t come under your remit, I would be most grateful if you would elevate this issue to the correct department.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – 26 December 2013 17:42

Dear Mr Bailey

I wish to draw your attention to the subject title and I consider the ICO are now using Section 12/4b of the EIR in the same manner as they are using section 14/1 of the FOIA 2000.

As recently as last week the ICO are using my case GIA/3037/2011 as a Court Authority whilst the GIA case is STILL live. Please see recent ICO attached decision.

This is contrary to Stare Decisis and Common Law. It also drives a Bus through Common Sense.

The ICO are willfuly and flagrantly using Section 12/b of the EIR and section 14/1 of the FOIA as tools to circumvent BOTH acts.

In a nutshell the ICO are using both Acts to circumvent the Acts and in particular sect 77 of the FOIA 2000.

I would be most grateful if you would bring this matter to the attention of your line manager please.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield
http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2013/fer_0483175.ashx

http://informationrightsandwrongs.com/
http://informationrightsandwrongs.com/2013/11/26/knowing-what-to-overlook/

http://informationrightsandwrongs.com/2013/11/26/knowing-what-to-overlook/#comment-2841

27 October 2013 18.47Dear Mr Bailey

I would be most grateful if you would forward this email to the ICO complaints manager.

I am the complainant in this particular case and the decision notice of 3rd Oct 2013 which has been published on your website prior to notifying me. I have not received any notice from the ICO ref this decision. I now request the ICO to review your decision and to re-send this FN to me via post and mail please. The date on the letter will be the first applicable date for leave to appeal to the FTT. Please also be advised that I intend to appeal this decision to the FTT.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2013/fs_50493287.ashx

Attn Mr Andrew White ICO Group Manager

Dear Mr White

Further to my email yesterday ref the ICO Decision Notice FS50493287 dated 3rd Oct 2013. Please treat this as an official FOIA request for information pertaining to the subject title.

1. Please provide the name and initial of the ICO caseworker responsible for this case.

2. Please provide copies of ALL letters,emails between the ICO Caseworker and the Stockport Borough Council Caseworker/Legal Rep.

3. Please provide copies of all telephone conversations,case notes etc between the case worker and the SBC.

4. Please provide copies of letters.emails sent from the ICO caseworker to Dransfield.

5. Please provide details of who conducted the Public Interest Test and when it was undertaken.

6. Please provide me with the Official letter and ICO decision via post and email because as of today, the ICO have failed to inform the Complainant, i.e Alan M Dransfield

This information and documents are required to assist me compile my application to the FTT.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield