This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 2:19 PM
Subject: FOI 88765 response – Dransfield.doc
UK CampaignFOIA
Dear Maurice
If you have one ounce of honesty and integrity you will cycle down to the Ministry of Justice and kick their doors down and demand an explanation to this hogwash letter.
Yours in disgust
Alan M Dransfield
Dear Tim Turner,
When you said:-
“I have had to prevent a comment from appearing here because it was a
series of libelous and unfounded allegations.”
I assume you mean my statement about you. Oh well, you obviously don’t have the courage to publish what’s being said
about you.
Whilst I would expect some of my
allegations against the Devon County Council have indeed vexed numerous people, if they had handled my allegations of malfeasance and fraud etc properly and
in accordance with their own complaints procedures they wouldn’t be in this mess now.
It is as clear as day that Devon County Council AND the ICO AND Judge Wikeley have
treated me as vexatious not my FOIA request. Vexatious is an adjective and the
introduction of protean word by an, I am led to believe, unqualified lawyer, Tom Cross, confirms they
don’t have a full understanding of English.
My Upper Tribunal hearing was a test case and neither Cross or Wikeley are language Experts.
http://lawrenceserewicz.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/vexatious-requests-guidance-weakening-our-power-to-make-the-state-speak/
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/130612w0001.htm
(Scroll down to Lord Willis/FOIA)
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 2:02 PM
Subject: ICO New Vexatious Guidelines Version 1 (201305
To Richard Bailey, ICO Solicitor
Dear Mr Bailey
I note the New ICO Guidelines version 1- 20130514 (37 page document) is not dated.
Can you please advise me why that document was NOT signed and NOT dated.
If such matters don’t come under your remit, I would be most grateful if you would elevate this issue to the correct department.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent – 26 December 2013 17:42
Dear Mr Bailey
I wish to draw your attention to the subject title and I consider the ICO are now using Section 12/4b of the EIR in the same manner as they are using section 14/1 of the FOIA 2000.
As recently as last week the ICO are using my case GIA/3037/2011 as a Court Authority whilst the GIA case is STILL live. Please see recent ICO attached decision.
This is contrary to Stare Decisis and Common Law. It also drives a Bus through Common Sense.
The ICO are willfuly and flagrantly using Section 12/b of the EIR and section 14/1 of the FOIA as tools to circumvent BOTH acts.
In a nutshell the ICO are using both Acts to circumvent the Acts and in particular sect 77 of the FOIA 2000.
I would be most grateful if you would bring this matter to the attention of your line manager please.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2013/fer_0483175.ashx
