Alan Dransfield's Blog

http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/Decision/i1819/Whittaker,%20Joseph%20EA-2016-0020%20(04.07.16).pdf

From: alan dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 July 2016 08:52
To: Louise Mottershead
Cc: BRADSHAW Ben; GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Fiona Miller miller; John BERCOW; aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Richard Bailey; Maurice Frankel
Subject: HALLELUJAH,HALLELUJAH DRANSFIELD IS NOT VEXATIOUS

Miss Louise Mottershead

PA to Elizabeth Denham

Dear Madam

Please see the attached
First Tier Tier Tribunal decision which now requires the ICO/UT/Court of Appeal and
Supreme Court to revisit the GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO case.

The FTT Judge Callender Smith has made a very courageous decision or he has now seen the error of his ways and has ignored the Supreme
Court Vexatious authority.

Judge Callender Smith claims that public authorities are
abusing the Dransfield Vexatious case.

Please ensure this letter is brought to the attention of
Miss Denham, the incoming Information Commissioner.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – 03/07/2016 12:10

Dear Mr Bailey

I consider the enclosed ICO decision is unlawful because
you have failed to include the Court Authority on which the ICO rely upon, i.e
the GIA/373/2011\Dransfield v ICO

Please bring this matter to the attention of your legal
team to avoid any repetitions, and please amend this particular decision.

With thanks

Alan M Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1624536/fs_50618433.pdf

Email sent – 03/07/2016 09:07

Dear Mr Bailey of the ICO

Please see the attached link
for both the Upper Tier Tribunal and the Court of Appeal ref the infamous Dransfield Vexatious
decision.

There appears to have been some
tampering with this decision and the dates have been changed. The UT decision
was in Jan 2013 not 2015. Furthermore, the CoA decision does not reflect the
decision I hold on file.

Please bring this to the
attention of the outgoing Information Commissioner and the incoming IC

with thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

http://www.osscsc.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=3680

Email sent – 03/07/2016 07:13

Dear Mr Bradshaw MP

Please see the Information Commissioner’s Office decision which refuses a FOIA request
from a British citizen under section 14/1 Vexatious.

Saudi Arabia is not one of most transparent countries in the
World and I doubt if they have any FOIA.

The ICO has used section 14/1 in this particular case
because they don’t want to upset the Saudi Government. Nice one ICO.

Could you please write to the
ICO asking them not to use my good family name when contacting the Saudi government or any other similar despot country.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1624536/fs_50618433.pdf

Email sent – Wed 01/06/2016 21:34

To – Richard.Bailey@ico.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Mr Bailey

Does this mean the ICO are beginning to realise the error
of their ways with the Dransfield Vexatious BS?

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1560487/fs_50573503.pdf

Email sent – Sun 05/06/2016 04:38 to mckenzie.friends@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Sirs

I would like to submit evidence
ref Mckenzie Friends Consultation.

My name is Alan M Dransfield and on the 24thMay 2016 I was
ejected from an Upper Tribunal Hearing (Information Rights) teleconference by a
First Tier Tribunal Judge Mr Callender -Smith whilst I was attempting to assist
Mr Norman Scarth as a Mackenzie Friend.

This can be verified by the FTT Appellant Mr Norman Scarth,
who I have cc this letter.

It is consistently obvious the FTT does not recognize the
Mckenzie Friend System

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Email sent Sun 05/06/2016 05:46 to GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk <grc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>; Civil Appeals – CMSC <civilappeals.cmsc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>

Application for Lay Person Appointment

Dear Sirs

Please send me an application
form for any future Lay Person appointments to either the First Tier Tribunal or the Upper Tier Panels.

As the UK’s leading Vexatious court authority, I feel I have
the required expertise to sit on the Lay Person’s Panel.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield.

From: alan dransfield

Sent: 27 May 2016 06:46
To: Richard Bailey
Subject: GIA/2615/2014 Scarth v ICO -FOIA REQUEST

Attn
Richard Bailey ICO Solicitor

Dear
Sir

Under
protection of the FOIA 2000,please provide me with the following information

1.
Total Cost of this case to date.

2. A
copy of the ICO apology to Mr Scarth ref the ICO mistake, e treating his
request as personal data not an FOIA request.

3. An
electronic copy of all ICO case files on this specific case.

4.
Copies of KBW invoices from on this case plus all KBW letters and emails.

5.
Copies of all ICO internal email from ICO.

6. Who
directed the ICO not to attend the teleconference for last Tues 24th May 2016?

For
clarity, this is my First FOIA request regarding Mr Norman Scarth or this
specific case GIA/2615/2014, therefore, it should not be considered as
vexatious and it is not an environmental issue, therefore should not be
considered under section 12(4)(b) “Manifestly Unreasonable”.

For the
record, I am Mr Norman Scarth’s McKenzie Friend. On Tues 24th May 16, Mr Scarth
and myself were unlawfully ejected from the teleconference of the FTT in London
after only 7 mins into the hearing.

With
thanks

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield