Alan Dransfield's Blog

http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/uploadedFiles/Decision074-2016.pdf

Scottish ICO decision which shows they have not
yet been corrupted with the Vexatious BS.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/491615/Responses_A_-_C.pdf

http://contracabal.com/880-07-21.html

A dysfunctional organisation is incapable of reform due
to its own dysfunction.

A dysfunctional organisation is incapable of reform due
to its own dysfunction.

Email sent – 12 January 2016 20:27

To: Richard Bailey

cc: BRADSHAW Ben

Subject: Re: £2800 Legal Costs

Mr Bailey

I do not believe I can improve upon my offer of 50p
per week to pay

off the £2800 legal costs from the infamous vexatious BS decision.

Blood and stone come to mind

Dransfield

From: alan dransfield
Sent: 26 November 2015 07:12
To: Richard Bailey
Cc: BRADSHAW Ben; christopher.graham@ico.org.uk;
graham.smith@ico.org.uk
Subject: FOIA Request ref your two Mr Smith the Deputy IC.

Dear Mr Bailey

Polite follow up please to my FOIA request for all the
available information on the termination of employment of Graham Frank Smith and David Smith,
the two deputy Information Commissioners

If they resigned, please provide me with a copy of their
resignation letter. If they were terminated, please provide me with copies of
their termination letters, reasons etc. Please provide me with copies of all
internal memos, emails etc related to the departure of the two Smith’s from the
ICO.

Could it be the Smiths are leaving a sinking ship?

This matter is in the public interest so please do not
refuse my request under the old Vexatious chestnut.

You have not yet offered me a reasonable explanation how I
am supposed to submit a review request before the ICO issues an official
Decision Notice.

With thanks

Your etc

Alan M Dransfield

Subject: COMPLAINT AGAINST KBW SOLICITOR RACHAEL KAMM REF
SUPREME COURT REF UKSC/2015/DRANSFIELD V ICO0173

Supreme
Court

Dear
Sir or Madam

I
wish to make a formal complaint against Miss Rachael Kamm from KBW who is
acting for the 2nd respondents Devon County Council ref subject title.

In
particular, I refer to her FORM 3 INFORMATION ABOUT THE SECOND RESPONDENT
CASE, dated 25th Sept 2015.

Miss
Kamm claims my application to the Supreme Court is out of date which is a
deliberate act of deception. The Court of Appeal decision was dated 14th
May 2015 and my Application to the Supreme Court was dated 23rd June 15. It is
not the date of the CoA decision, it is the date of the covering letter
from the Court of Appeal that starts the time limit clock ticking, which was
4 days later.

It
is consistently obvious that my Application to the Supreme Court was well within
the 42 days statutory requirement.

She
also claims, I did not serve a Certificate of Service Notice (SoSN) on the Devon
County Council which is factually incorrect. I
served a CoSN on BOTH the ICO and the Devon County Council. My CoSN to the ICO
was via email and they will surely verify this. I did not email the DCC owing
to my lifetime email ban.

My
CoSN was served on the DCC by a hand carried letter. The Respondents ICO have
not made any such application.

Even
if I did not serve a a CoSN to the DCC, it beggars belief that the ICO have
not contacted them with such an important matter.

Please
also note that Miss Kamm has purposely omitted page 6 to 12 of my SC
application. Why would she do that other than deceptive motives.

One
further crucial omittance by Miss Kamm is that she has failed to inform the
Supreme Court that the As Built Health and Safety Files (ABHSF) have been
published since the Court of Appeal decision, which confirms the Rugby Bridge
has been devoid of any Lightning Protection for the last decade.

For
your information, action and files.

With
thanks

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield