Blog Image

Alan Dransfield's Blog

Freedom of Information and Health and Safety

This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.

Richard Bailey, Senior Information Commission Solicitor

Vexatious Posted on Tue, July 28, 2015 18:51:26

Richard Bailey is the Senior Solicitor at the Information
Commissioners Office (ICO). Unfortunately his actions and inactions have
allowed the ICO to freefall into meltdown and has allowed the gagging of Joe
Public.

In particular, please see the Upper Tribunal decision
2012,UTUK-440/ACC aka GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO &Devon County Council.

This case has been allowed to navigate its way through the waters of justice from the ICO /FTT/UT and the Court of Appeal costing
many thousands of pounds from the public purse.

The CoA upheld the UT vexatious decision in May this year
under C3/2013/1855 Dransfield v ICO.

Interestingly, it was Richard Bailey who appealed the FTT non-vexatious decision and not the public authority i.e the Devon County Council (DCC).

In actual fact, this case crashed on take off because the
PA (DCC) were not the rightful or legal owners of the sought after
data ie the Exeter Chiefs Rugby Bridge in Devon. Hence, this was not under the
protection of the FOIA 2000. In other words this case was conducted by
HM Judges under the wrong jurisdiction.

Alan M Dransfield, the infamous Devon FOIA Campaigner, claims
the FOIA is under attack from the ICO in order to gag Joe Public.



Select Committee inquiry into Freedom of Information

Vexatious Posted on Mon, July 27, 2015 20:31:06

Email sent – 27/07/15 19.56

Attn of the Select Committee overseeing an inquiry into the
FOIA 2000

Ladies and Gentlemen

I understand you have been given the remit to make formal
inquiries into the FOIA 2000 and to this end I wish to offer tangible evidence
that will assist your task and reduce the cost to the public purse with
your investigations..

In actual fact there is not a lot wrong with the FOIA 2000
other than a few irregularities and anomalies with the legal
interpretation of section 14 (1) vexatious exemptions.

The primary reason why the FOIA is NOT seen to be working
and in my view is currently in meltdown is because the oversight authorities i.e., the ICO have been conniving and colluding with rogue judges and rogue public authorities nationwide in a wider conspiracy to circumvent
section 77 of the FOIA 2000.

In particular, I draw your attention to the Upper Tribunal
decision 2012-(UTUK) 440-AAC a.k.a. GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO and the
Devon County Council. This case has been used in approximately 400 other vexatious
decisions handed down on a whim by the ICO.

That’s 400 vexatious decisions handed down by the ICO since
Jan 2013.

It would be prudent of you to examine GIA/3037/2011 in close
detail because that decision is the main reason for the meltdown of the ICO.

The Court of Appeal upheld the Vexatious decision and
by doing so rubber stamped the gagging of Joe Public. Please see CoA decision
C3/2013/1855 Dransfield v ICO & Devon County Council.

Arbitrary vexatious decisions are being handed down by the
ICO with the sole intent to cover up serious sex crimes and serious economical
fraud.

Please feel free to call me as a witness for your ongoing
inquiry.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Devon Campaigner.



Overturned “vexatious” decisions from the ICO

Vexatious Posted on Mon, July 13, 2015 20:26:26

http://search.ico.org.uk/ico/search/decisionnotice

Please copy and paste this link into your browser.



Proof the Dransfield actions were not vexatious

Vexatious Posted on Sun, June 21, 2015 08:32:31

Email sent: 20 June 2015 18:56

Dear
Mr Bailey, ICO Solicitor

As
you are aware, I am scheduled to attend an UT hearing ref the Stockport Borough
Council now the Court of Appeal have made their final decision.

To
this end, please be informed there is breaking news from Stockport which
supports my claims that my FOIA request was NOT vexatious and is in the Public
Interest; hence cannot be termed as vexatious.

I
refer to the Jackson Brickyards pond adjacent to the Vale View school which is owned by
a private fishing club who are contemplating suing the Stockport BC for legal breaches
ref the drainage of the pond.

You
are also aware that Sheila Oliver, a leading FOIA Campaigner in Manchester, has
been labeled as a Vexatious Requester ref this same school.

In
theory, the school drainage debacle at the Vale View School confirms my
allegations that the …….and the SBC and the ICO have acted in
concert to pervert the Course of Justice by willful breach of section 77 of the
said Act.

At
this Juncture,i t would appear that £250K allocated for the School Drainage has
gone AWOL.

The
ICO are based in this neck of the woods,hence, they may be familiar with
Jacksons Pond. It is Jackson Pond not On Golden Pond?

Please
acknowledge if you are familiar with the breaking news ref this pond. Could
this be the fishes coming home to Roost?

I
also remind you there is an outstanding UT Case v the DCC ref
EA/2010/0152 Dransfield v ICO which was also stayed by the UT pending the
CoA decisison and I remind you that you have not yet addressed the issue ref the original 6 Schools.

Too
busy counting your legal cost claims against a Devon pensioner, no
doubt.

For
your information, action and files

Yours sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angling-club-threatens-take-stockport-9424885
(Please copy and paste this link into your browser)
“An angling club says it will take legal action unless a council honours an old agreement to install proper drainage at its pond.

Reddish Angling Club agreed to let Stockport Council use Jackson’s Pond as an overflow for excess water from playing fields at the nearby Vale View Primary School, on condition that proper drainage was installed.

But the club claims the council has not held up its side of the bargain, which it agreed to in writing, because the drain that has been installed is only half the agreed size and doesn’t work.

As a result, the pond has flooded on numerous occasions since the school opened in 2011.

he authority says it is aware of the problems and has promised to involve the club in discussions about how to solve it.

The club’s committee has had to spend more than £8,000 of club funds to raise the pond’s banking by 18 inches and has even had to call the fire service out to pump away excess water.

Despite carrying out extensive work themselves, they say there are still long periods of time when the pond is so badly flooded that members can’t use it.

Flooding caused by poor drainage at Jackson’s Pond, home of Reddish Angling Club

Club banking manager Stephen Feast said: “The drain they put in is far too small and is always blocked.

“If you look in the manholes on the road next to it, they are always bone dry.

“It’s just a disgrace. Members have to pay a subscription every year, and most of the time they can’t even use half the pond. I’ve never seen it so bad.

“All we want is a meeting with their solicitor and our solicitor. We just want to talk to them sensibly.

“We just want them to uphold their end of the bargain, but if they don’t come up with an offer we will be left with no option but to take them to court.

“We’ve done everything the council wanted us to do, we’ve upheld our end of the bargain, and this is how they treat us.”

A Stockport Council spokesman said: “Over recent years we have been discussing the problem of drainage at Jackson’s Pool in Reddish with Reddish Angling Club and have met with their representatives.

“Clearance of roots has taken place from the pipe but this hasn’t solved the problem.

“The council is currently working to find a longer-term solution to the problem and will involve the angling club in these discussions.”



ICO

Vexatious Posted on Tue, June 02, 2015 07:26:47

http://contracabal.com/880-37-58.html

(Please copy and past this into your browser.)



Taylor v ICO decvision

Vexatious Posted on Sun, May 31, 2015 07:13:33


Court of Appeal, refusal of leave to appeal

Vexatious Posted on Sun, May 31, 2015 07:09:58


Inconsistency at the Information Commissioner’s Office

Vexatious Posted on Sun, May 03, 2015 08:44:27

This case, at the very least, shows an extreme inconsistency by the Information Commissioner’s Office.



« PreviousNext »