Alan Dransfield's Blog

Email sent – Tue 01/03/2016 11:00

To: Terry.burns@santander.co.uk

Dear Sir

I refer to your undated report and the fact you have
discussed the Dransfield Case GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO in some length. I
wish to make a follow up complaint to your office ref the fact you have
debarred me from giving evidence to the current inquiry team.

In a nutshell the Vexatious Case Authority ref the
Dransfield Case is a tool designed by crooks to assist the passage of fraud and
theft of public funds and to cover up heinous sex crimes.

For your information,action and files

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/491615/Responses_A_-_C.pdf#page154

Email sent – Wed 24/02/2016 07:48

Dear Mr Bailey

Under protection of the FOIA please provide me with the
following information.

1. Copy of each invoice from KBW for each individual
case.

For the avoidance of doubt this is a brand new request for
each individual case listed. I will concede that I have asked for other KBW
invoices for other ICO defence cases, but not the listed cases. Therefore, you
cannot rely on that old vexatious chestnut but no doubt you will try.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield.

informationhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/502812/Analysis_of_First_tier_Tribunal_decisions_on_sections_35_and_36.pdf

Dear Mr Bradshaw MP

Four (4) different police authorities have used the
Dransfield vexatious Court Authority in the last two weeks. For more info
see Information Commissioner’s Office decisions:-

1 FS 50587947 Staffs

2.FS 50605046 Herts

3.FS 50611417 Cambridge

4.FS 5060768 West Midlands

It looks as though all the plebs nationwide are jumping on the Dransfield
vexatious Bandwagon The question is
what are you going to do about and what is the Labour Party going to do?

Yours in disgust

Dransfield

Email sent – Sat 27/02/2016 19:11

Dear Mr Bailey

Please see the attached First Tier Tribunal decision. Could you please advise me
if the Information Commissioner’s Office has appealed this decision.

With thanks

Alan M Dransfield

http://www.farrer.co.uk/News/Briefings/Information-Matters-New-ICO-Guidance-on-Section-14-FOIA–dealing-with-vexatious-requests/

Email sent – Sat 20/02/2016 06:52

Dear Mr Bradshaw MP

Please see the attached non-vexatious decision by the ICO
and in particular para 13 which cites my name.

Could it be the ICO have seen the error in their ways with
the inappropriate use of the vexatious BS Exemption as per section 14/1 of the
FOIA2000.

What can be clearly seen in this attached ICO decision is
the ability of any rogue PA to SWITCH their plea, eg from cost exemption under
section 12.4 to vexatious under section 14/1.

For your information action and files.

Alan M Dransfield

FOI Expert Devon

Email sent – Sat 20/02/2016 07:13

Attn of Lady Justice Goddard

Chair of the Child Sex Inquiry

Dear Madam

As you are aware, we have exchanged correspondence several
times before in which I have made serious allegations ref HM Judges and the
Information Commisisoner’s Office, whom, I claim are unlawfully using section 14/1 of the FOIA 2000 to obstruct justice and to pervert the course of justice.

Please see the Supreme Court decision ref UKSC/2015/0173
Dransfield v ICO, which I claim is part of a wider conspiracy to circumvent the
FOIA 2000 and in particular to breach section 77 of the said act to cover up child sex crimes.

This Supreme Courtdecision will surely compromise your current
inquiry. Please be aware, I have now made a formal appeal application against
the Supreme Court order to the European Court of Human Rights.

For your information, action and files.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield