Alan Dransfield's Blog

From: alan dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]

Sent: 27 July 2016 06:06
To: BRADSHAW Ben
Cc: Louise Mottershead; elizabeth.denham@ico.org.uk
Subject: IF DRANSFIELD IS VEXATIOUS BLAIR IS A LYING MURDERER

Dear Mr
Bradshaw

May
I remind you about this attached Guardian article which make reference to my
Vexatious case history. It really does leave a bad taste in my mouth because
you are well aware that my original FOIA case was not vexatious, as proved by
the publication of the As Built Health and Safety file which, incidentally, has
been removed from the Devon County Council website.

The
Guardian have the audacity to claim I am vexatious, without checking the
facts.

For
your information,action and files

Yours
in disgust

Alan
M Dransfield

https://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2013/nov/18/freedom-of-information-requests-dransfield-case

Email sent – : 27 July 2016 06:41

To: guardian.readers@theguardian.com
Subject: COMPLAINT AGAINST A GUARDIAN ARTICLE

Dear Sirs

I wish to make a formal
complaint against the following Guardian article and in particular against the
author of the attached article Mr Tim Turner.

Mr Turner failed to investigate
the subject title before he published his article because there is consistent
tangible evidence that my original FOIA request was not vexatious.

I am sure the Guardian are conscious of the fact that a FOIA
request cannot be refused under section 14/1 vexatious exemption if:

1.There is serious purpose behind the request.

2.The request is made in the Public Interest

3.The request is the first
request.

Had Mr Turner checked the facts of this case, he
wouldn’t have reached his final conclusion, i.e Dransfield FOIA was vexatious.

It would appear to me your Mr
Turner has a very cozy relationship with the ICO, to the extent he has ICO
blood running through his veins.

May I suggest you withdraw your
article under the title of Dransfield is NOT Vexatious and print the facts that
the ICO are complicit with HM Judges and Ministry of Justice along with a public apology for damaging my good name.

UK Journalists have a duty of care to check their
facts prior to publication and it is consistently apparent your Mr Turner is
ignorant of the FOIA 2000 and in particular section 14/1 of the said act.

Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you need further information/clarification. I will gladly give
the Guardian an exclusive interview which will reveal the facts, i.e Ministry
of Justice complicit with the ICO/HM Judges and rogue public authorities to
pervert the Course of Justice.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

UK’s Leading Court Authority on Vexatious Requests

https://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2013/nov/18/freedom-of-information-requests-dransfield-case

Email sent – 28/07/2016 07:05

Information Commissioner

Attn Mr Richard Bailey

Dear Sir

Under protection of the FOIA 2000, please advise me of:

1. Have the ICO appealed against the FTT decision of the
subject title.

2. If not why not.

May I take this opportunity in stating my deep
disappointment that the ICO have decided to “body swerve” the
Dransfield UT Case today in London ref GIA/1496/2016. What sort of
message does this send to the general public when the ICO fail to turn up for
an UT hearing. This reflects a cozy relationship between the ICO and HM
Courts/Judges. The vexatious decision for today’s Hearing has already been
made.

With thanks

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – Fri 29/07/2016 06:24

Lady Justice Goddard

Child Sex Abuse Inquiry

Dear Madam

As you are aware, we have
exchanged correspondence several times before about the subject title.

I now hold irrefutable evidence
that the ICO are conniving and colluding with HM Judges and rogue public authorities to pervert the course of justice. In particular, they are using the
GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO as a tool to prevent the freedom of information
and obstructing the flow of information.

This action has been upheld by the Court of Appeal and
Supreme Court and will compromise your Child Sex Inquiry.

I will gladly meet with your inquiry team to explain this
matter in detail. In a nutshell, the Ministry of Justice are perverting the
course of Justice ref the unlawful use of section 14/1 vexatious exemption.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – 30/07/2016 06:41

Attn Elizabeth Denham

Information Commissioner

Dear Madam

Please confirm you have
received a copy of the As Built Heath and Safety File (ABHSF) from your PA
Louise Mottershead.

It is of paramount importance
that you read and understand the legal ramifications of this ABHSF
because this legal document clearly demonstrates the ICO are in meltdown
and they have conspired with the Devon County Council and HM Judges to pervert
the Course of Justice ref the application of vexatious exemptions re
GIA/3037/2011/Dransfield V ICO.

In a nutshell, the ABHSF proves without a shadow of doubt that the Judge
Wikeley’s vexatious decision was manufactured out of political expediency and
perverted mindset.

It is also most disconcerting
to learn that the ICO failed their duty of care in the last couple of years ref security cameras nationwide.

Please see the following url link which clearly shows the ICO are colluding
with 3rd parties ref security cameras failures nationwide. It beggars
belief the ICO have redacted their own email chain.

I reiterate the
importance of a personal meeting with you to discuss these matters.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the-ico/disclosure-log/1431810/irq0562444a.pdf

Email sent – 30/07/2016 07:11

Information Commissioner

Elizabeth Denham

Dear Madam

Please see the KBW Law firm
report on the Dransfield Vexatious claptrap. Any fair minded person would
agree that KBW appear to get most if not all of the ICO legal works which is a
breach of EU Trade Law.

This KBW report confirms my allegation that the ICO are in
meltdown.

For your information, action and
files

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

http://www.11kbw.com/uploads/files/UseandAbuseofFOIACK.pdf

Email sent – 30/07/2016 08:02

Solicitor Regulators Authority

Dear Sirs

I wish to lodge a formal
complaint against a public authority solicitor who, I claim has acted in bad
faith to pervert the course of justice.

In particular, I refer to Mr
Richard Bailey who is the Solicitor for the Information Commissioner’s Office
(ICO).

ICO records will show that Mr
Bailey has knowing and willfully circumvented sect 77 of the FOIA …….An ocular inspection of ICO decision
notice records will show bad faith and willful blindness by Mr Bailey. I
refer to GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO.

ICO records will also show that section 14/1 of the FOIA is
being abused to hand down vexatious exemptions on a whim by Mr Bailey.

This ICO notice will show Mr Bailey acted in concert with
the Ministry of Justice, Devon County Council and other 3rd parties to defraud
me and other UK Citizens.

For you information, action and files

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield