Alan Dransfield's Blog

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8002424.stm

Email sent –

Leicester City Council
FOIA Department
Dear Tracey

I acknowledge and thank your for the FOIA Package for 4 PFI
schools in your district, which I received yesterday via Royal Mail. I now
request a review because I claim the information you sent me was not as per my
FOIA request.

My request was was for a copy of the AS BUILT HEALTH AND SAFETY
FILES. The information which you sent by post was for four (4) PFI
schools.

1. Judgemeadow Community College

2. Crown Hiils College

3. City of Leicester

4. Soar Valley

The information you sent me was not the As Built HSF; it was
the pre-construction HSE files which are a completely different animal altogether.

It is clear from the data which
you sent is written in the future tense ,i.e pre-,construction the documents refer to
the design shall be, the new school shall be, the classrooms shall be, the road
shall be, the roof shall be, the fire hazard plans shall be, the safety system
shall be etc. The consistent use of shall be is a clear indication the data you
sent was not the ABHSF. The dates on this data also support my claims., ie
2005/06/07.

The data on the ABHSF would be post completion
certificate.

However, I do commend the
Leicester City Council for releasing this information which they considered to
be the As Built HSE files because my own public authority have refused a
similar request under section 14/1 of the FOIA -2000 vexatious exemption.

It is consistently obvious to
me the Leicester City Council are not aware of the difference between Pre
-Construction Files and As Built HSF.

The total number of pages received in the package is approx
200 pages and the package weighed about 3/4 kilos which also which is yet
another indicator that the data you sent was not the sought after data.

As Built Health and Safety Files for 4 PFI schools would
weigh in the region of 4-500 KG; hence, that is why I asked for PDF files
which are available according to the information you sent yesterday because it
refers to the BUZZASAW System.

I would also point out that the four files you sent yesterday breach the DATA 1998 because there is not
one single redaction.

The files includes personal details of personnel.

I also note that one of the
schools appears to have been built on a Landfill Sitewhich is still gassing.

Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you need further clarification between Pre-Construction data
and As Built Data.

The information you sent me confirms that Miller
Construction was the Principle Contractor for these schools. They were the same
Contractor whose PFI schools in Scotland were subject to serious H&S defect
a few weeks ago.

With thanks

Yours Sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

Email sent – Fri 08/07/2016 06:45

Louise Mottershead

PA to the Information
Commissioner Miss Newham

Dear Madam

Please see the following link which confirms the
GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield v ICO has been used to protect the David Kelly
secrets.

It would appear …. Christopher Graham at the Information Commissioner’s Office has
acted in concert with the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court to pervert the
course of justice……..

This latest revelation about the ICO being complicit with Blair and current Government Officials and in particular to use the GIA/3037/2011
Dransfield v ICO is of the gravest allegation, it behooves your office to alert
Miss Newham.

Please add this to my list of misconduct by ICO officials, as it is
imperative Miss Newham is informed about this matter asap.

As you are aware, I am on record that the ICO are in meltdown and these
David Kelly allegations compound the matter.

I do state that the Dransfield Vexatious Case and the conduct of the ICO are
a top priority for the New Information Commissioner Miss Newham, who takes
control on the 18th July 2016……..

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.

For your information, action and files.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/vexatious_foi_requests

PS

May I take this opportunity in submitting a brand New FOIA request to the
ICO.

1. Please advise me of Christopher Graham’s pension plan details.

2. Please advise me if Christopher Graham has signed a Comprise Agreement.

http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/Decision/i1819/Whittaker,%20Joseph%20EA-2016-0020%20(04.07.16).pdf

From: alan dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 July 2016 08:52
To: Louise Mottershead
Cc: BRADSHAW Ben; GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Fiona Miller miller; John BERCOW; aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Richard Bailey; Maurice Frankel
Subject: HALLELUJAH,HALLELUJAH DRANSFIELD IS NOT VEXATIOUS

Miss Louise Mottershead

PA to Elizabeth Denham

Dear Madam

Please see the attached
First Tier Tier Tribunal decision which now requires the ICO/UT/Court of Appeal and
Supreme Court to revisit the GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO case.

The FTT Judge Callender Smith has made a very courageous decision or he has now seen the error of his ways and has ignored the Supreme
Court Vexatious authority.

Judge Callender Smith claims that public authorities are
abusing the Dransfield Vexatious case.

Please ensure this letter is brought to the attention of
Miss Denham, the incoming Information Commissioner.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield