Blog Image

Alan Dransfield's Blog

Freedom of Information and Health and Safety

This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.

Fire, Mr Bradshaw, Fire, Fire

PFI Schools Posted on Tue, January 12, 2016 08:17:43

Email sent – 10/01/2016 20:1

Dear
Mr Bradshaw

As
you are aware, I have raised fire safety issues at the 6 Private Finance Initiative schools in Exeter.
Please see the following article about PFI school fire hazards in the
Wirral:

Does fire safety construction flaw at PFI school affect
Wirral schools?

11/1/16 08:19 Edited to change University Academy Birkenhead to Birkenhead Park School as it changed its name last year.

A report to be considered by councillors on the Merseyside Fire and Rescue Authority‘s Performance and Scrutiny Committee on Tuesday afternoon warns, during a fire at a PFI school on Merseyside, that smoke spread from a ground floor kitchen to a protected staircase.

Further investigation found the same problem at eleven additional PFI sites.

Wirral has a number of schools constructed using PFI that are managed by Wirral Schools Services Limited. It is not known if any of the schools on the Wirral are affected by this. Here is the information from the report.

Case Study 2: Fire Separation in Major Construction projects

24. A site visit to a local school on 9th January 2015 following a fire on 7th January 2015 (incident no 32304) identified serious fire separation concerns due to smoke spread from the ground floor kitchen to the 1st floor protected staircase.

25. The school was built as part of a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) initiative. The investigation led to 11 additional PFI sites where the same issues were detected. As the issues potentially had national implications Protection Officers utilised the CFOA [Chief Fire Officer Association] Community of Practice to share the risk information. It was subsequently established that the same issue had been found in other major new-build / refurbishment projects across England with estimated repair bills totalling in excess of £100m.

26. Officers escalated the issue to the CFOA Fire Engineering Technical Standards Group due to the national potential in order that the risk information can be effectively shared with other Fire and Rescue Services and that national guidance is produced to ensure that these issues are dealt with consistently and effectively.”

Will either of the two Wirral councillors (Cllr Lesley Rennie and Cllr Jean Stapleton) on MFRA’s Performance and Scrutiny Committee ask if any of the Wirral PFI Schools (Leasowe Primary, Bebington High, Birkenhead Park School (previously University Academy Birkenhead and before that Park High), South Wirral High, Weatherhead High, Hilbre High, Prenton High, Wallasey High and Wirral Grammar Girls) or the two Wirral PFI City Learning Centres (Wallasey City Learning Centre and Hilbre City Learning Centre) are affected by this?”

I would call upon MP to write to the Devon County Council to enquire if such dangers have been considered at the Exeter PFI schools.

With thanks

Alan Dransfield



Does anyone know what they are doing at the Supreme Court?

Vexatious Posted on Tue, January 12, 2016 08:14:23

Email sent – 10/01/2016 07:05

UK Supreme Court

Mr Greenberg,Case Manager

Dear Sir

Subject: UKSC/2015/0173 DRANSFIELD V ICO /IRREGULARITY WITH SC DOCUMENT SEALS

Further to my earlier email ref the UK Supreme Court document seals, I have re-examined the one page Judgement Seal dated 14th Dec 2015
signed by your Registrar (illegible name) and the light blue seal has NOT been
added onto the Judgement Paper i.e., it is an integral part of the original
paper.

I have also re-examined my application forms for my Notice
of Appeal and it can be clearly seen the Supreme Court seal has been added to the
document as per your rules of procedures.

Therefore it would seem that the one page Judgement Paper dated 14/12/15 is not in line with your own Rules of Procedure dated 2009
and, in particular, rule 16.5.

(5) An order of the Court
shall be prepared and sealed by the Registrar to record any decision made under this rule.

I also note the Judgement date is the same date which my application was considered i.e., 14th Dec 2015!??

I do not accept your registrar should be sending out spider squiggle without their full identity.

Please add this to my long list of complaints ref irregularities
and anomalies with the Dransfield case.

Please also consider this as a formal request to quash the
Expenses order in para 2 of your purported Court Order, owing to the anomalies
and irregularities.

In a nutshell, the one page piece of paper you sent to me
does not constitute a COURT ORDER or a COURT JUDGEMENT/DOCUMENT. It is part of
a wider conspiracy to gag Joe Public.

For you information, the registrar name appears to be Loiuse
di Maurinho.

For your information, action and files.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield



Does anyone know what they are doing at the Supreme Court?

Vexatious Posted on Tue, January 12, 2016 08:14:16

Email sent –

UK Supreme Court

Mr Greenberg,Case Manager

Dear Sir

Further to my earlier email ref the UK Supreme Court document seals, I have re-examined the one page Judgement Seal dated 14th Dec 2015
signed by your Registrar (illegible name) and the light blue seal has NOT been
added onto the Judgement Paper i.e., it is an integral part of the original
paper.

I have also re-examined my application forms for my Notice
of Appeal and it can be clearly seen the Supreme Court seal has been added to the
document as per your rules of procedures.

Therefore it would seem that the one page Judgement Paper dated 14/12/15 is not in line with your own Rules of Procedure dated 2009
and, in particular, rule 16.5.

(5) An order of the Court
shall be prepared and sealed by the Registrar to record any decision made under this rule.

I also note the Judgement date is the same date which my application was considered i.e., 14th Dec 2015!??

I do not accept your registrar should be sending out spider squiggle without their full identity.

Please add this to my long list of complaints ref irregularities
and anomalies with the Dransfield case.

Please also consider this as a formal request to quash the
Expenses order in para 2 of your purported Court Order, owing to the anomalies
and irregularities.

In a nutshell, the one page piece of paper you sent to me
does not constitute a COURT ORDER or a COURT JUDGEMENT/DOCUMENT. It is part of
a wider conspiracy to gag Joe Public.

For you information, the registrar name appears to be Loiuse
di Maurinho.

For your information, action and files.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield