Blog Image

Alan Dransfield's Blog

Freedom of Information and Health and Safety

This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.

Mr Sowerbutts, what are you up to?

Vexatious Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Mon, January 06, 2020 19:21:55

To: grc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

c.c Elizabeth Denham, Richard Bailey

Sun 05/01/2020 13:07

First Tier Tribunal

Dear Sirs

Polite follow up please to subject title as I am awaiting leave to appeal from the FTT to the UT.

As you are aware I am on record claiming egregious conduct maladministration  by the FTT  Registrar in this case. I would like to remind you that the ICO are applying a blanket vexatious exemption on ALL my requests. They are on record from their Mr Adam Sowerbutts that ALL my FOIA requests  will  be treated under section 14/1 and sect 50(2)(c) whatever the subject which is a major breach if my civil, legal and human rights and the FOI 2000

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

FOIA Campaigner and Social Watchdog



Public Authority using this rubbish decision for their own ends

Vexatious Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Mon, December 16, 2019 19:35:20

Further proof that PA’s nationwide are using the Dransfield vexatious decision to withhold data. See para 18 of this decision.

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2019/2615677/fs50816509-1.pdf



Not only do we have ambiguity on VEXATIOUS, we now have similar rubbish on DECISION definition

Information Commissioner Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Sun, October 06, 2019 15:13:52
016-011019-DECISIONDownload


The ICO add shackles to Vexatious Dransfield

Vexatious Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Wed, October 02, 2019 21:17:43

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2019/2615092/fs50802258.pdf



Supreme Court Dransfield decision

Vexatious Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Sat, September 28, 2019 18:08:39
SUPREME-COURT-JUDGEMENT-REF-DRANSFIELD-V-ICO


FOIA request of Elizabeth Denham. Will she bother to respond?

Information Commissioner Posted by Sheila OliverPosted on Sun, September 15, 2019 15:50:59

Sun 15/09/2019 10:16

Information Commissioner 

elizabeth.denham elizabeth.denham@ico.org.uk; casework@ico.org.uk; Richard Bailey Richard.Bailey@ico.gsi.gov.uk; Richard Bailey Richard.Bailey@ico.org.uk

Dear Madam

Under protection of the FOIA 2018 please provide me with the following information  ref the subject title:

1. Total  government funding for DATA Protection. 

2. Funds spent on GDPR  specific case  between May18 and May  2019.

3. At this juncture the ICO have not taken a single complaint and used their enforcement powers to assist any DATA Complainant. Why is this?

4. How many ICO officials are working directly on GDRP cases?

I fully understand that I do not need to provide you with my motive  for this or any FOI request. However, in the interest of clarity and probity the ICO are not assisting the general public whose data rights are being infringed other than advise the complaint to seek a Judicial Review.  Why should Joe Public be cost impacted of a Judicial Review when the ICO are the oversight Authority of the GDPR 2018?

The ICO are not backward coming forward to issue fine on the Huge PLC like Facebook and Virgin etc,  but the ICO do not appear to be remotely interested in the average Joe Blogs who data rights have been infringed by a public authority.

with thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield 

FOI Campaigner and Social Watchdog