This blog is aimed at shaming those who ignore health and safety and those who abuse the Freedom of Information Act out of laziness, corruption or to cover up incompetence.
British Transport Police
Dear Sir
Fri 13/12/2019 21:09
Crowther, Paul paul.crowther@btp.pnn.police.uk
It is now 135 days post the suicide of Robert A Pickthall death at Acton Bridge. Please advise why you have not released any details into the public domain.
With thanks
Alan M Dransfield
From: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:49 AM
Subject: London Mayor FOIA Disclosure Log
To: elizabeth.denham <elizabeth.denham@ico.org.uk>
Cc: <mayt@parliament.uk>, John BERCOW <john.bercow.mp@parliament.uk>, <news@dailymail.co.uk>, CHANNEL 4 <news@channel4.com>, The Local Denmark <news.denmark@thelocal.com>,
Eleizabeth Denham
Information Commissioner
Dear Madam.
I have taken the liberty in sending you this FOI Disclosure Log from the London Mayor’s Office. This is an excellent site and in full compliance with section 19 of the FOIA 2000.
The reason I have sent it to you is because the ICO are in breach of the FOIA section 19 because you do not have any disclosure log at your website. This is compounded by the fact the ICO/FOIA are in constitutional crisis because the Cabinet Office have hijacked the FOIA 2000 whilst being in contempt of court ref the Lockerbie Bombing and Libya Papers inter alia.
For clarity and avoidance of doubt the ICO disclosure log should not be mistaken for the ICO Decision Notices website. The ICO have a legal obligation in accordance with section 19 to publish their FOIA requests and response in a similar fashion to the attached URL Link. Are you not supposed to lead by example?
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
Information Commissioners Office
To Elizabeth Denham, Information Commissioner
19/11/201
Dear Madam
There is compelling evidence that you and your office have acted in concert to pervert the course of justice and to hide infant deaths at Shrewsbury Hospital. Please see the attached ICO decision which relies on section 40 (personal data). It was not personal data that this FOIA requester was seeking, it was a total number of deaths not the ID of the infants. This ICO decision clearly supports my claims of egregious conduct by the ICO and Shrewsbury Health Trust
Yours etc
Alan M Dransfield
FOIA Campaigner and Social Watchdog
https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2019/2615555/fs50841738.pdf
Paul Crowther Chief Constable
British Transport Police
27/11/2019
Dear Sir
It is exactly four months since the suicide of Mr Robert Pickthall and you have failed to publish any details of this specific death. I am sure the general public would like to see how, why, when Mr Robert Pickthall died on Network Rail premises. I fervently believe you are guilty of egregious conduct in the manner you have investigated this specific death. I have been advised by your staff that I am a key person and would be kept informed which has NOT happened. I was advised 8 weeks ago that the British Transport Police “re-investigated” this death. Are you in a position to define the re-investigation?
I have also been advised by one of your subordinate staff that you have not failed your duty of care directly and actions of your staff cannot be held accountable by your good self. My response to that is hogwash; you are the Chief Constable of the BTP and the actions and inaction of your officers are indeed the direct responsibility of the Chief Constable. If your officers have ignored the general public’s concerns that foul play is the root cause of Robert Pickthall’s death, then you are responsible for your officers.
One thing is for sure Robert Pickthall did not jump under the Euston Flyer and the BTP and you in particular have failed your fiduciary duty of care.
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
FOI Requester and Social Watchdog
Joint
Committee on Human Rights
Houses of Parliament
London
SW1A 0AA
Dear Sirs
I wish to report serious and consistent breaches of article 10 of Human Rights Act by the Information Commissioner (IC) in the manner they are using section 14/1 of the FOIA 2000.
I contend the ICO and the Justice Department are failing their fiduciary duty of care to ensure VEXATIOUS has been given full legal definition of the word. At this juncture, the ICO and tribunals are relying upon the Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent (DVCP)(2015)EWCA Civ 454 14th May 2015 which infringes article 10 of the Human Rights Act. Moreover, the ICO have used the DVCP over 10,000 times since the Upper Tribunal decision UKUT 440 (AAC) in Jan 2013. Most, if not all Government departments are also breaching article 10 of the HRA when they rely upon the DVCP.
I respectfully call upon the UK Joint Committee on Human Rights to investigate my allegations please.
with thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
FOIA Campaigner and Social Watchdog
