Alan Dransfield's Blog

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/659606/FOI_Code_of_Practice_-_Draft.pdf

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2017/2013939/fs50610253.pdf

“83. The term “vexatious” is not defined in the FOIA. The Upper Tribunal (UT) considered the issue of vexatious requests in the Information Commissioner v Devon CC & Dransfield (UKUT 440 (AAC), 28 January 2013).1 The UT commented that “vexatious” could be defined as the “manifestly unjustified, inappropriate or improper use of a formal procedure”. This definition clearly establishes that the concepts of proportionality and justification are relevant to any consideration of whether a request is vexatious.”

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioonlinepodcast/2019/01/25/alan-m-dransfield-freedom-of-information-show-p2

This document can be more clearly read via this link:
http://www.sheilaoliver.org/alan-dransfield.html

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=alan+dransfield+pilgrim+father+you+tube&view=detail&mid=50688970FCAB3602029350688970FCAB36020293&FORM=VIRE

Email sent – Mon 03/09/2018 10:54

Information Commissioners Office

Dear Madam

Under protection of the FOIA 2000 please provide me with
copies of the following

1. All correspondence between the ICO and David Lidington ref the recent changes to sect 45 of FOIA

2. Records of all phone calls, meetings etc
and personal notes from Ms Denham to the Queen on same subject.

3. Copies of all correspondence from your office pertaining
to sect 45 changes and responses from the Cabinet Office. This request is
neither vexatious, wide or unfocused.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=678184955873290&id=100010453752400&src=email_notif