Alan Dransfield's Blog

From: alan dransfield

Sent: 26 May 2016 06:57
To: BRADSHAW Ben
Cc: aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
Richard Bailey; govem@parliament.uk;
John BERCOW; Norman Lamb
Subject: Fraud by First Tier Tribunal Judge

Dear Mr
Bradshaw

I
can now identify the First Tier Tribunal Judge who appeared to pervert the
Ccurse of justice on Mon 23rd May 2016 during a NEW FTT hearing involving
Mr Norman Scarth and myself acting as Mr Scarth’s Mackenzie Friend.

It was
Judge Calender-Smith from the FTT.

From
start to finish of this FTT hearing lasted no more than 10 mins and then
Judge Smith aborted the hearing because he said I had not identified myself,which is factually incorrect as the FTT Tape Recording will show.

Mackenzie
Friends are allowed in the British legal system and there is a myriad of
examples from court authorities which support this statement.

Judge
Callender-Smith aborted this hearing solely because Alan M Dransfield was a
Mackenzie Friend in one of his cases.

Judge
Callendar Smith …….has unlawfully used the Vexatious Exemption against me
several times to date.

He has
now stooped to the lowest standard possible be debarring my access to HM
Courts.

I
call upon my MP to write to the Lord Chancellor and demand a public inquiry
into the conduct of this FTT Judge.

For
your attention, action and files

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield

Dear Mr Bailey

This is the latest Vexatious
Hogwash produced by ICO Mafia

Yours in disgust

Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1624250/fs_50588826.pdf

From: Alan M
Dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 May 2016 21:29
To: BRADSHAW Ben
Subject: Another Upper Tribunal Strike- out against Dransfield

Dear Mr Bradshaw

Please be informed the Upper Tribunal (UT) have delivered yet another strike out
against me in GIA/ 246/?2015 Dransfield v ICO ( again).

Unfortunately, I don’t have a PDF copy of this particular UT
decision from
Judge Mitchell but suffice to say the UT have a real grudge against
Dransfield and are blocking me at every turn.

My FOIA request was seeking Common Purpose connections/cosy relationship
with KBW law firm/ICO fraud complaint procedures and a number of other
benign and straightforward requests.

It will send you a PDF copy of the latest UT BS decision which is part of
wide conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, but what the hell do you
care about that.

For your information, action and files

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

From: alan dransfield [mailto:alanmdransfield@gmail.com]

Sent: 13 May 2016 06:54
To: giles@gileschichestermep.org.uk;
trevor.coleman@th-eu.nit.com;
info@grahamwatsonmep.org;
linda@juliegirling.com;
mep@williamdartmouth.com;
ashley@ashleymep.co.uk
Cc: BRADSHAW Ben
Subject: Complaint against EU Court of Human Rights

South
West MEPS

Dear
All

Please
see my letter to Ben Bradshaw below which is self explanatory. I am seeking
assistance from MEP SW ref EU Court of Human Rights Failures.

With
thanks

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield

—————————————————————————————

Dear Mr
Bradshaw

I
wish to make a formal complaint to my MP ref the conduct of the European Court
of Human Rights and in particular about their Registrar Miss Lafferty, who is a
UK Government gatekeeper.

Miss
Lafferty has destroyed my application bundle to the ECHR on a mere
technicality twice.

I am
attempting to appeal the Supreme Court on the Dransfield Vexatious infamous
Case and if you had once ounce of integrity you would be kicking doors down at
the EU Court on my behalf, because if I fail to overturn this Vexatious claptrap ref GIA/3037/2011,the FOIA -2000 and EIR -2004 will be become extinct.

In all
probability, that is why you are not prepared to help me because you are part of
the wider conspiracy to pervert the course of justice on this Vexatious BS.

Even
the electronic application Form at the EU Court of Human Rights is designed to
cheat the Aaplicants. You try to fill the form in on line and see what I mean.

At this
moment in time, the Vexatious Llgacy rests squarely on my shoulders because I
am the Leading Vexatious court authority in the UK as in GIA/3037/2011
Dransfield v ICO, and please rest assured Mr Bradshaw this decision leaves
a bad taste in my mouth.

In the
first instance, I would ask you to write to the MEP South West asking him to
assist my application. I would also ask you to alert the Lord Chancellor on this
matter but there again, he is fully aware of this because he is one of the
perpetrators along with the ICO and HM Judges.

In
a nutshell, the Dransfield Vexatious case is by far the most important
FOIA case to pass through the ICO and subsequent courts because my case is being
used unlawfully as a Court Authority to support get out of jail free cards by rogue judges and rogue ICO officials.

In
the event I do not get the Vexatious Decision overturned, Joe Public will be
gagged forever.

For
your information, action and files.

Yours
sincerely

Alan
M Dransfield

PS

Polite
reminder for a copy of the Devon County Council reply to your letter ref Exeter
PFI schools.

Why the subtle change?

” 2. Law. (of legal actions) instituted without sufficient grounds and serving only to cause annoyance to the defendant.”

“LAW

denoting an action or the bringer of an action that is brought without sufficient grounds for winning, purely to cause annoyance to the defendant.

“a frivolous or vexatious litigant””

Email sent – Mon 14/03/2016 08:27

Dear Mr Bailey

Can you please advise me if the Home Office conformed to this request.

With thanks

Alan M Dransfield

https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2016/1560487/fs_50573503.pdf

Email sent – 16/03/2016 07:10

Dear Mr Bradshaw

I am sure you are aware that the EC of Human Rights
have recently overhauled their Appeal
Application system to improve their transparency, accountability and security
(TAS). Guess what? Their TAS system is still not working, as their attached letter clearly indicates.

The EC have refused my application on the sole grounds of
one missing document,i.e., The grounds of Appeal to the Supreme Court.

It is not a big issue for me to send a copy of the
Supreme Court Grounds to Appeal and the EC are wrong to destroy the whole application based upon such a small oversight i.e., zero tolerance to errors.

It is a big issue for me to re-send the whole package, but
I will jump through their silly little hoops in the interest of justice and
the saviour of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

I call upon my MP to write to the European Courts of
Human Rights and Justice and the UK MEP Justice Committee seeking reassurance
that the general public are allowed fair access to the EC of Human Rights. I am
sure you are familiar with the saying, “justice delayed is justice
denied”.

I am sure any fair minded person would agree that the EC
of Human Rights are wrong to debar application based on one missing document.

I rather suspect that Miss Lafferty, the UK Government
Gatekeeper, is lurking around the Application Registrar to debar the average Joe
Bloggs and to debar access to the Human Rights Courts.

For your information, action and files

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield

From: Alan M Dransfield

Sent: 18 March 2016 06:16

To: Richard Bailey CC: BRADSHAW Ben MP

Subject: Dransfield v ICO GIA246/2015

Dear Mr Bailey

As you are aware we are awaiting an Upper Tribunal
hearing date for

this particular case which is not connected to next
weeks First Tier Tribunal hearing.

On a separate issue, you are also aware the UT have
imposed an email ban against me
hence; would you be so kind as to ask the UP for dates to avoid for this hearing. Being mindful of the public purse costs for these hearings, don’t you think it would be cheaper
and less stressful to all if you simply provided me with the sought
after information?

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield